Tuesday, June 5, 2007

prostitution, dirty industry or valid profession




Why is one of the oldest professions on earth illegal in almost every state of the U.S.? Prostitution is something that has always been looked down upon in American society, but has continued to remain in the shadows. No matter how much it is disliked, it seems it will never go away. So, if it is not affecting people who do not choose to associate with it, why do we care to prosecute those who choose to partake in this activity? The sexual habits of two consenting adult really is not any business of societies. Legalizing prostitution has many positive aspects. Legalization of prostitution would promote safety and reduce crime, it would put law enforcement resources to better uses, and finally it would promote civil liberty and privacy.

First off, legalized prostitution would promote safety and reduce crime. For example in Nevada where prostitution is legal, the state law requires that registered brothel prostitutes be checked weekly for sexually transmitted diseases and monthly for HIV. Furthermore, condoms are mandatory for all oral sex and sexual intercourse. Brothel owners may be held liable if customers become infected with HIV after a prostitute has tested positive for the virus (Armentano, par.4). Controlled and regulated atmosphere will not only create safety for the ladies, but as well as their customers. Plus, containing these activities to designated locations will keep it off the streets and out of the neighborhoods. Thus, unwanted exposure to this business is minimized, out of sight, out of mind. Having a designated place for prostitutes keeps them safer. With their activities being illegal they are forced to work at night and get into the cars of strangers, making them prime targets to be robbed, beaten, or even killed. Whereas if it was legal, they would safely be inside with watchful management to protect them from such criminal acts. If such acts did occur they would not have to fear reporting it. All together prostitution and our streets would be a much safer business if it were legalized.

Next, legalized prostituition would put our law enforcement to better use. The police spend much of their time dealing with prostituitioin in one way or another. They will protrol areas specifically to arrest prostitutes and they will set up lengthy sting operations. All this is being done while murders go unsolved, rapist remain free, and countless property is stolen. Some researchers would say that so much police attention is focused on prostiution because the duties involved with it are more pleasant , less dangerous, and less complex. By allowing law enforcement to focus on such a futile task, we are giving them an easy way out of solving real crimes. Terrible crimes take place everyday, so it would be of immense value to us to have more law enforcment available to attend to them.

Finally, legalized prostituition would promote civil liberty and privacy. Laws against prostituition violate Americans rights of individual liberty and personal privacy. It isn’t any of societies business what two consenting adults choose to do behind closed doors. Provided, that an act doesn’t harm others, aren’t we legally entitled to do what we please? If so, why do we continue to waste time and money prosecuting those who participate in the prostituition business. A good example of this is provided by author Arthur Hoppe who said, “The function of the government is to protect me from others. It’s up to me, thank you, to protect me from me.” People have the right to control their own bodies and decide the best way to conduct their lives. The government does not have the right to tell women they can not charge a fee for something that they are otherwise allowed to give away for free. If the government is allowed to regulate sex and how it is dispensed, what is stopping them from telling us how many children we can have, who we are allowed to have sex with, or even what are reason is for having sex. Giving the government control of one aspect of sex opens up a can of worms as to where their boundries on sex end. We supposedly live in a free country so why should the government control such a personal aspect of someone’s life? The answer to this question is simply that they shouldn’t. Keeping prostituition illegal is a major violation of civil liberty , and an invasion one’s privacy.

Overall, prostitution should be legalized. The positive aspects of making prostitution legal far outweigh the few negatives that may exist. I know that legalizing it is something that many people fear, but the truth is they shouldn’t. Some think that if prostitution is made legal, it will lead to an increase in the amount of people doing it. I think this notion is ridiculous. Stripping and the porn industry are legal, but we don’t see little girls putting these jobs on there list of top five careers for when they grow up. Instead of wasting police resources and public money on attempting to prosecute prostitutes, it is just more effective to legalize prostitution. It is a much better idea to spend a fraction of the resources in creating a healthy environment for both prostitutes and their customers. Legalized prostitution will help reduce crime and will promote safety. Legalization will free up our law enforcement for more important duties. Legalized prostitution will also be giving privacy and liberty as it is deserved. Legalization seems to be the best solution to the prostitution industry. It is time we stop prosecuting one of the oldest professions on Earth, and start dealing with it in a more appropriate manner.

Bibliography
Armentano, Paul. The Case for Legalized Prostitution. Dec 1993. The Future of Freedom Foundation. 2007.
http://www.fff.org/freedom/1293e.asp

intro to "critical analysis piece"

As my final piece I chose a seminar preparation paper written about "The Pursuit of Happiness" written on May 24, 2007, the ninth week of the quarter. I chose this paper as my analytical piece. I chose this paper as exemplary example of this category because I was able to use my analysis of the book to express my opinions. This showed my improvements as a thinker because it showed my ability to take what I have read and provide my own meaning of its content. For example Gardner said,“By my definition, money is the least significant part of wealth.” I took this to mean that being able to provide for his family is more significant than the actual money.

{seminar} the pursuitt of happyness


1.) Word List

Abhors- To shudder. To regard with extreme repugnance. To loathe.

Tirades- A long angry speech, usually of criticism or denunciation.

Cajoled- To persuade somebody to do something by flattery or gentle but persistent argument.

Euphemism- A word or phase used in place of a term that may me considered too direct or harsh.

Brethren- The members, especially men, of a particular church or other religious group.

Bourgeois- According to the Marxist theory, relating to the social class that owns most of the wealth, and is regarded as exploiting the middle class.

2.)
A. “By my definition, money is the least significant part of wealth.” By this I think Gardner means that being able to provide for his whole family is more significant than the actual money. My definition of wealth is having everything I have ever wanted, being able to provide for my loved ones, no longer having to work, and being able to travel the world carefree of expenses.

B. Gardner shows a remarkable resiliency to overcome abuse, homelessness, and other hardships. The important factor that create this resiliency is his character. Gardner has an ability to find the positive in all things. He has been able to take whatever circumstances he’s in and make them work. He doesn’t dwell on the negative. He gets knocked down, and gets back up. I would say that my grandparents displayed similar characteristics to Gardner. They went through the depression where they virtually had nothing, and were able to come out of it. They went on to purchase a home in a middle class neighborhood where they raised four children.

3.)
There wasn’t much holding me in Milwaukee. After that spring of 1970, while watching the March Madness NCAA finals when Moms gave me the greatest gift her wisdom could offer by saying, “Son, if you want to, one day you could make a million dollars,” I knew that wherever my path lay, I was to have to leave my home turf and go find it (Gardner 114)